When lacrosse returns to the Olympic Games in 2028, it will be the first time since 1908 that lacrosse appears as an official Olympic sport.
However, the sport does have a history with the Olympic Games beyond that year. Lacrosse appeared in multiple Olympics as a demonstration sport — usually native to the host country included to promote its appeal — in 1928, 1932 and 1948.
This is the story of the 1948 RPI lacrosse team, the last to represent the United States in the Olympic Games. Compiled from archives and interviews with living members of the team at the time of its publication Aug. 31, 2016, we are republishing this article in light of Monday’s news.
IT HAD BEEN THREE YEARS SINCE WORLD WAR II ENDED. Ned Harkness, then 27 years old, had coached just four games at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute before the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941, but he quickly turned a group of inexperienced players into a national contender.
After just three full seasons, RPI was on top of the lacrosse world. It finished the 1948 season with a 13-0 record, averaging 13 goals per game and scoring wins over Yale, Syracuse and Virginia.
During the season, it was announced that lacrosse would join Swedish ling, a form of gymnastics, as a demonstration sport at the London Olympics, and RPI got the nod to represent the U.S. and became the first team to travel to England since Syracuse in 1923.
Just four years young, the RPI men’s lacrosse program raised some $20,000, via fundraisers at home games, to fund the trip to the Olympics, part of an eight-game tour against the top teams in England. Efforts at RPI’s matchup with Virginia raised a hefty $5,000. There were separate events like pie-eating contests.
The 30 players took a bus from Troy, N.Y. to New York City and set sail across the Atlantic aboard the Marine Flasher, headed for Marrie Oulde, England, as fans held up a sign that read “Your Troy rooters wait to read more winning box scores.”
The team slept in bunks six beds high and brought 875 pounds of canned goods for the trip. Food was scarce and conditions in a post-war England were harsh enough to warrant a debate as to whether the London games could even go on.