Often, when diversity in lacrosse (or the lack thereof) is discussed, folks are quick to peg the reasons for the game’s lack of reach in the inner city as being the result of broad non-local issues.
“More kids in the inner city would play if they could go to camps.”
“More kids would play if gear was cheaper.”
“More kids would play if there were lined fields.”
“More kids would play if there were more players that looked like them and they were being marketed at.”
“More kids would play if there was a more viable professional league.”
I’ve heard some version of this for years. And there are some good points. There’s certainly a resource imbalance where kids in wealthier communities have better and more access to gear, club teams, pay-to-play events, trainers, fields, college access tours and much more. It’s an issue.
But I don’t think it’s THE issue. Take a drive to Darien, Conn., Cockeysville, Md., or Shove Park in Camillus, N.Y. You’ll see that kids love the game, and the game loves them back, and not primarily because they have better gear or went to a summer camp.
They love the game because they have been taught it the right way. There are legions of local parents who grew up playing and who double as quality youth coaches. People in and around town know what skills to teach and when. The kids grow and have fun, and the culture of lacrosse is reinforced wherever they go. When they get home, they see mom’s All-American awards or Dad’s old Bacharach helmet. They talk about “Doug Knight’s Dive in ’95” at the dinner table and remember Maryland’s dominance in the women’s game. Kids go to their local rec center, join town leagues or local clubs, and they play pick-up lacrosse with their friends on neatly manicured lawns at home.
And the benefits to those communities are enormous. Lacrosse has helped numerous youngsters become better students, better people and eventually better employees and parents. They gain entry to elite colleges and join a broader network that will benefit them for the rest of their life.