Last week, we identified the top seeds with blind résumés. Now, we turn our attention to how the committee will handle the battle for the final seeded slot, and thus hosting duties.
Barring major upsets, the top seven are likely locked in for hosting responsibilities: Maryland, Boston College, Stony Brook, James Madison, North Carolina, Florida and Northwestern. Three teams—Penn, Towson and Loyola—are battling for one spot.
If these teams win out, it’s going to be very difficult for the committee to tell them apart.
As it stands today, the margin is razor thin because all three represent the 8th-10th spots in the RPI, have Top 10 strength of schedule averages between 19-22.5 and carry at least two significant wins in the RPI Top 20, and at least four significant wins in the RPI Top 30. Geographically, they’re all close to one another and likely one of them will be paired with the host as a possible No. 8 vs. No. 9 game in the second round.
There are five primary criteria. If the committee sees the teams deadlocked after the primary criteria, they can use secondary pieces such as the last six games and their records against teams already in the tournament field.
Let’s see the comparison.
Primary Criteria
|
Team A (11-2)
|
Team B (13-2)
|
Team C (12-3)
|
RPI |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Top 10 SOS (Avg. Ranking) |
23rd (22.2) |
26th (22.5) |
15 (19.0) |
Significant Wins (RPI Top 25) |
3 |
3 |
5 |
Significant Losses |
None |
None |
None |
Head-to-Head |
N/A |
Lost to Team C |
Beat Team B |
Common Opponents |
3-0 with Team B
None with Team C |
3-0 with Team A
2-0 with Team C |
None with Team A
1-1 with Team B |
Primary Criteria Breakdown
|
Team A (11-2)
|
Team B (13-2)
|
Team C (12-3)
|
RPI 1-10 |
0-2 |
1-2 |
1-1 |
RPI 11-20 |
3-0 |
1-0 |
3-2 |
RPI 21-30 |
2-0 |
2-0 |
1-0 |
Notable Wins (vs. RPI) |
Nos. 11, 13, 17 |
Nos. 4, 13, 21 |
Nos. 9, 15, 16 |
Secondary Criteria
|
Team A (11-2)
|
Team B (13-2)
|
Team C (12-3)
|
Last Six Games |
4-2 |
6-0 |
5-1 |
Vs. NCAA Teams |
3-2 |
3-2 |
4-4 |
We begin with Teams B and C for comparison.
RPI edge is nearly identical, and will likely go down as a tie. Team C takes the Top 10 strength of schedule category. In pure numbers, Team C has more significant wins (5) than Team B (3), but Team B’s best win is the RPI No. 4. It’s conceivable the committee will value quantity, but in the past, it has valued quality. So C gets the breaker there. Plus, that win over No. 4 gives the common opponents category to Team B because Team C lost to No. 4. Lastly, Team B won the lone head-to-head matchup, which leaves us with an essentially tied ballot, 2-2, with a possible edge to Team B because of RPI ranking.
In secondary criteria, Team B is a perfect 6-0 in its last six games, while Team C is 5-1. Team C also has a winning record against teams projected into the NCAA field (3-2), while Team B is 4-4. Team B is ranked ahead of Team C.
Now, let’s compare Teams A and B.
This is arguably murkier because again we have a one-spot RPI difference, but the Top 10 SOS category is determined by an average of just 0.3. Both teams have three Top 25 wins, but Team B’s win at No. 4 will likely let it carry that category. Both teams went 3-0 against common opponents and they didn’t play each other.
How will the committee handle this? Will the committee give Team A the No. 8 seed because of slight margins in RPI and SOS, or will they move on to secondary criteria because the profiles match so closely?
If they go to secondary criteria, both teams are projected 3-2 against the NCAA field. Team B is 6-0 in the last six, while Team A is 4-2. All things considered, this is an agonizingly tough call, which we project will be given to Team B.
Résumé Reveal
Team A: Penn
Team B: Towson (projected No. 8 seed)
Team C: Loyola
It would not be surprising to see either of these three teams grab the No. 8 seed on May 7. Fortunately for the committee, it will not greatly alter the bracket since all three teams would be hosting geographically friendly teams.
Other Notes About This Week’s Bracket
The bubble expanded this week after Duke lost to North Carolina, dropping the Blue Devils out of at-large consideration with a 7-8 record. Duke has to beat Virginia Tech on Thursday to keep its hopes alive and can afford a loss in the ACC Semifinals, provided it beats first-year program East Carolina on May 6.
Additionally, with Richmond losing to UMass, and subsequently UMass falling at VCU a few days later, there is no bid thief scenario from the Atlantic 10. That’s now a one-bid league.
Lastly, Notre Dame losing to Albany leaves the Irish with the most significant loss of any bubble contenders and would likely need a pair of wins in the ACC Tournament to hop back into consideration.
This is good news for teams like Stanford, USC, Johns Hopkins, Navy, Dartmouth, Princeton and Denver, who run the gamut from being considered likely in to possibly out. They’re all are one major win away from locking up an at-large berth, and some may get in even without an extra win.
Notes: Records against the Top 10, Top 11-20, Top 21-30 and losses to teams outside the Top 30 are based on performance against the current RPI rankings (as of April 22), not human polls. First place teams are listed as automatic qualifiers. Ties go to the highest rated team in the RPI.